ClearLaunch
Feature CheckerRegulations & PoliciesEnforcementRadarVendorsChangelogGuides
FAQ
← All Controls

US state money-transmitter licensing tracker

money-transmitter-licensing-trackerDomain: paymentsType: process

Description

US money-transmitter licensing is the state-by-state regulatory regime that catches platforms moving customer funds (peer-to-peer transfers, marketplace escrow with payout discretion, prepaid balances above the closed-loop threshold, certain crypto-on-and-off-ramps) and that has no federal preemption mechanism. There are 49 state regimes plus DC and Puerto Rico, each with its own definition of money transmission, its own licensing application, its own surety-bond requirement (typically 25,000 to 1,000,000 USD depending on transaction volume and state), its own net-worth and permissible-investments rules, and its own examination cadence. The Conference of State Bank Supervisors maintains the Nationwide Multistate Licensing System (NMLS) which standardizes the application UI but not the substantive obligations. The operational shape: identify the states where the activity meets the local definition of money transmission (the threshold is fact-specific, with California's MTL definition among the broadest and Montana having no MTL regime at all), pursue licensure, maintain the bonding and net-worth requirements, file per-state reports, and respond to examinations. The piece that surprises operators is the time and capital cost of a multi-state rollout: 18 to 36 months and several million USD in bonding capital is typical for a national footprint, which is why most platforms phase the geography rather than launching with full coverage.

Applicability

Applies when: markets include US AND sector is fintech.

How predicates are evaluated

Required by (2 regulations)

  • US MTL

    Per-state MTL framework + federal MSB registration; CSBS NMLS aggregator; per-state capital ($50K-$1M+), surety bonds ($25K-$7M+), examination cycles 12-36 months; NY DFS BitLicense + California DFAL substantive overlays for virtual-currency activities.

    Bank Secrecy Act, 31 U.S.C. §§5311-5336; 31 CFR Chapter X; per-state Money Transmitter Acts

  • UK FCA Payments

    UK Authorised PI vs Small PI distinction; SPI registration under £3M average monthly volume cap; Authorised PI capital scaled to service category (€20K/€50K/€125K initial); FCA Connect platform application; ~6-12 month application timeline.

    Payment Services Regulations 2017 (SI 2017/752); Electronic Money Regulations 2011 (SI 2011/99); FCA Handbook

Fulfilled by (1)

  • In-house build · high effort

ClearLaunch does not accept payment from vendors. Methodology.

Evidence formats

  • per-state license register
  • NMLS filings
  • surety bond certificates

ClearLaunch provides legal information based on publicly available regulatory sources. It does not constitute legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before making compliance decisions.

ClearLaunch

Regulatory intelligence for people who ship products.

Tools
Feature CheckerRegulations & PoliciesVendorsGuidesFor LegalFor EngineeringFor ExecutivesFor Investors
About
AboutMethodologyChangelogFAQRegulatory UpdatesClearLaunch on LinkedIn
Legal
Terms of ServicePrivacy PolicyHow we handle your dataCoverage scope & limitations

Built by Neel Patel, in-house game counsel. Games touch more compliance domains at once than anything else in tech. That's what ClearLaunch was designed around.

ClearLaunch provides legal information based on publicly available regulatory sources. It does not constitute legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before making compliance decisions. Operated by a Washington-licensed attorney. Not licensed in California or other US states. ClearLaunch provides legal information; consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction. Data reviewed through March 2026. Methodology

© 2026 ClearLaunch · Terms · Privacy